Fast Food Eaters Are Consuming Industrial Chemicals

in ,

Do you like eating fast food? If yes, then you might reconsider your habit after reading this article. Several research studies have found out that people who consume fast food all the time have high levels of industrial chemicals in their bodies.

 

What’s Inside Your Favorite Fast Food?

Research indicates that most fast food items contain the chemical substance called phthalates which are used to make plastic materials durable and flexible. This type of molecule is also found in soap, food packaging, cosmetics, and other consumer items.  The Center for Disease Control noted that exposure to this kind of compound is highly rampant in the United States.

While the effects of the exposure to these industrial chemicals are not yet fully known, scientists suspect that it might have effects on cell development, especially among pregnant women and children. In fact, laboratory research conducted on laboratory rats noted that exposure to such industrial chemicals can disrupt the male reproductive system. To date, the regulation of phthalates and other industrial chemicals is not very strong.

In a study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, a team of researchers studied 9,000 people between 2003 and 2010. The urine samples of the participants were tested for the presence of industrial chemicals. The study indicated that phthalate and another chemical compound called DiNP showed a positive relationship between high fast-food intake as well as exposure.  This means that people who tend to eat more fast-food have more phthalates in their urine.

 

What’s the Solution to our Fast Food Problem?

Although it is still difficult to determine the exact health risk that phthalate exposure provides, it is still important to take extra precautionary measures. For instance, in Japan food handlers are no longer allowed to wear any vinyl gloves during food preparation over concerns of the phthalate exposure. On the other hand, the United States government has also decided to restrict the sale of toys made with industrial chemicals.

Aside from being found in fast food items, they are also found in fruits and vegetables via the plastic wraps that they are sold in. That’s one of the reasons it is always important to wash your fruits and vegetables before you eat them. Industrial chemicals have deleterious effects on the body. Since it is suspected to have adverse effects on the body, some concerned groups are lobbying for the ban of industrial chemicals used on food—particularly fast food.

Moreover, they also encourage people to eat more healthy whole foods like organic fruits and vegetables to avoid exposure to these industrial chemicals. While we don’t have any laws to ban chemicals in our food, we can avoid these chemicals by avoiding fast food altogether. So instead of eating fast foods that are laden with industrial chemicals, eat clean, and enjoy whole foods like fruits and vegetables.

Inspired by fortune.com

What’s Next for Probiotics in Sports Nutrition?

in , , ,

There is a high demand for healthy beverages all over the world, which has given rise to probiotics, cold-pressed, organic, and plant-based beverages. This is the reason why food and beverage manufacturers have started developing sports nutrition drinks that are not only natural but also contain probiotic ingredients to attract a new market of health-conscious athletes and individuals.

Defining Probiotics

Probiotics are live bacteria that are good for the digestive system. In fact, we naturally have probiotics inside us.  The gut is where millions of bacteria live and if the population of your gut microflora is made up of good bacteria, you reap the benefits by having proper digestion as well as a healthy well-being.

So why should you drink probiotics if you already have them inside your body? Unfortunately, abusive lifestyles such as being stressed and eating processed foods can affect the number of good bacteria in your body. Moreover, if you have been taking antibiotics, your good bacteria are also eradicated as antibiotics are not selective when it comes to killing bacteria in the body. Adding probiotics to your diet is an excellent way to replace the population of good bacteria in your body.

Adding Probiotics in Sports Nutrition

Probiotics are already found in many fermented products that we consume. These include sauerkraut, vinegar, kimchi, yogurt, and many others. But many market innovators want to add probiotics to boost foods that do not traditionally contain them.

The use of probiotics as a primary ingredient in sports nutrition is becoming a popular trend and is expected to reach a global market value of $46.55 billion in the next four years.  For instance, companies like Ingredion, GoodBelly, and NextFoods Inc. are aiming to tap into the sports drink market by improving their product using probiotics. Soon, many companies will also join this trend and will create probiotic product lines that are not only limited to beverages but also protein bars and snacks.

The Rising Demand of Probiotics

In a recent survey conducted by Ganeden, it was noted that 70% of the consumers are open to consuming probiotics in food instead of supplements. The respondents also mentioned that they are willing to pay more for healthy foods especially those containing probiotics.

More and more people are becoming health conscious. They are aware and picky when it comes to what they are eating. People are now interested in looking for food that can give them more health benefits. The increasing demand for healthy and functional foods is the reason why food and beverage manufacturers are developing ways to incorporate probiotics into their products.

For now, probiotics are seen primarily as a potential ingredient for sports drinks, but manufacturers are innovating for the future use of probiotics in fruit beverages, baking mixes, granola bars and much more. It is forecasted that probiotics are set to make appearances in different types of products not only in sports nutrition but also in functional day to day products.

Inspired by fooddive.com

Half of Cropland Acres in the U.S. Were Devoted to GMO Crops in 2012

in ,

Farmers in the United States have been using genetically engineered organisms or GMO crops since 1996. These plants are modified so that they can resist pest and tolerate harmful pesticides. Genetically modified seed companies were so successful that 90% of the corn, cotton, soybean, sugar beets and canola are GMO crops. While crops like squash, papaya, and alfalfa are now being cultivated using genetically engineered (GE) varieties.  If you go to the countryside and admire acres of farmlands, you might just be surprised how many farms are planting GMO crops.

Acres of Lands Planted with GMO and Non-GMO Crops

According to USDA, there are about 182 million (of the 380 million) acres of agricultural land in the United States that have been planted with GMO crops of which 90% is planted with soybeans and corn while the rest with beets and cotton. Only 0.6% and 0.3% of said agricultural land were planted with genetically engineered varieties of vegetables and fruits.

On the other hand, there are only 5.4 million acres of farmlands that are certified organic farming systems. Only half of the organic system is used as a cropland because the rest is used for pasture. Out of it, only 0.3% is planted with non-GM corn and 0.2% with soybeans.  A large percentage of the cropland is planted with organic carrots, lettuce, squash and other vegetables.

 

Market Value of Non-GMO Crops

The USDA reported that organic corn and soy fetched higher prices than its GMO counterparts. While conventional farming resulted in more production, the consumers have shifted to patronizing organic products. In fact, most GE crops are now used to create processed foods and other food ingredients like breakfast cereals, corn chips, corn syrup, corn oil, soybean oil, and canola oil.

The non-GMO crops, on the other hand, continue to expand and co-exist with conventional crops as more and more people are looking for organically-grown foods and produce. This is the reason why many organic retailers are looking for additional assurance when it comes to labeling and differentiating their organic foods from the GMO crops. This is also to ensure that they get price premiums associated with organic cultivation.

 

Problems with GMO and Non-GMO Co-Existence

While it can be inferred that both GMO and organic crops can co-exist, there are still some problems related to its co-existence. The most common problem is how to maintain the integrity of the non-GM crops. Accidental pollination or co-mingling of the two types of plants is bound to happen which can result in a price drop of the premium organic food.

As a matter of fact, organic farmers from Nebraska, Oklahoma and Illinois have reported economic losses due to co-mingling of pollen. Unfortunately, this phenomenon has resulted in lower yields due to incompatibility. There are solutions implemented by the local organic farmers.  Practices such as the use of buffer strips can help protect the non-GM crops. Moreover, planting organic corn two to four weeks later than the conventional GMO crops can also prevent cross pollination.

Inspired by usda.gov

The Organic & Natural Health Association Scrap Natural Certification

in

Recently, the Organic and Natural Health Association held its first ever national conference. Among those that attended included thirty-five leaders in the industry of natural products. The CEO of the Association, Karen Howard, as well as former Senator Mark Pryor led the conference discussions on a new certification in the food industry.

 

The CEO set the tone of the conference by announcing the board’s conclusion after they had assessed the definition of “Natural.” The board’s decision is not what most of the industry would have liked to hear. It was concluded that the term “natural” could not and should not be used as a form of natural certification seal. More so, it should not be used on the product labels or even listed there. For most consumers, “natural” labeled products may soon be a thing of the past. However, the board did say that the term “natural” could be used in the description of particular attributes of the product in materials that are used for marketing and promotion.

Organic vs. Natural is Confusing Consumers

 

According to the research, it was assessed that the term “organic” and the term “natural” are quite confusing to the consumers. When the user is faced with a natural product, they would expect that it was automatically organic, and this is not the case. In the meeting, it was also noted that the consumer has a problem differentiating both of the products. It was this research among other factors that led to the conclusion that the board would not be considering a new “natural” certification seal. The primary reason was not to confuse consumers.

The director reiterated the necessity of increasing focus and encouraging people to go organic. For this, the institution would focus all their energy and resources to strengthen that program and the existing organic certification seal. The first order of business for this would be to support  Organic 3.0. The movement is being led by IFOAN Organics International. The intention is to have leading innovations that are geared towards providing people with sustainable agriculture and healthy products.

Since the public is more reliant on the labels that identify foods as natural, the CEO said that they would also try to make information more accessible to the public on how to identify foods that are organic.

At the same meeting, Howard announced the launch of the “Power of D” campaign which is a year-long outreach campaign that will focus on the benefits of Vitamin D. For this; they will also have an advisory board that helps to tear into the research backing the benefits of the vitamin.

At the close of the conference, the former US senator Mr. Pryor gave his two cents on how to reach out to the office of the attorney general regarding the adverse climate of the supplement industry. He went at length on how the office of the attorney general could help in the practice and how the interaction between the members of the attorney general’s offices and those of the Organic and Health Association would be beneficial.

Inspired by organicandnatural.org

Trader Joe’s Starting a Price War With Whole Foods

in

Trader Joe’s is looking to tip the scales according to findings by Deutsche Bank. In a recent price comparison that was conducted by the bank, it was found that Trader Joe’s had a basket of 77 items that were 26% cheaper than their primary competitor Whole Foods. It is expected that the looming war will continue as organics continue to warm their way into the hearts of most people. It is more than evident that Trader Joe’s has taken an early lead in that war with their bitter rival Whole Foods Market.

While you might be tempted to call this a foul cry, the bank had conducted previous visits to the stores, and while Trader Joe’s had maintained a lower price overall, it was never of such a high magnitude. This was when the bank realized we are in the middle of a price war.

Whole Food is in Trouble

Even worse for Whole Foods, the retail grocery hack on prices extends to the private label brands. Trader Joe’s private labels were found to be 15% less costly than Whole Foods. That is not the end of it. Whole Foods private labels have consistently tried to match up with Trader Joe’s over the years, but they will face difficulties matching the price because of the high-quality ingredients in their products.

Trader Joe’s is also growing and recently hit the 500 stores mark. The discrepancy in their pricing led one analyst from Deutsche Bank to deduce that this was the stores way of making a price investment. This is what equates to a discount in the world of grocery retail. This is not the first time that Trader Joe’s has slashed prices catching Whole Foods with their pants down. Just over three years ago, the organics foods store slashed prices of more than 200 of the items they sold. The effect might not have been as significant then considering that the store had only 300 stores. Another analyst shared her concern that Trader Joe’s might be trying to set up Whole Foods Market. In recent times, there has not been such disparity in the pricing of the store, and this could be a sign that they are trying to set up their rivals. According to the article in Fortune, the spokesperson for Whole Foods was unavailable for comment.

How Will Whole Foods Adapt?

After exposing that their comparable sales dropped by 1.8%  in the last quarter and expected to fall another 2% by the end of the year, the last thing that Whole Foods would need right now is a price war. On a lighter note, the store does expect to have its sales rise by 3% to 5% as a result of the increased number of stores.

Later in the year, the Whole Foods is expected to open their first 365 concept store. It would be the first in their cheaper chain of stores that are geared to targeting young customers that can’t afford to shop at organic retailers like Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s.

A positive move forward for Whole Foods will be to reign in the prices on perishable items like produce and dairy. The study by Deutsche Bank found that the price gap was larger than 25% for these items. Whole Foods will hope that the 365 concept store shows promise as they try to make it through the organic retailer price war in 2016.

Inspired by Fortune.com

Unhealthy Additives Are Transforming Gatorade

in , ,

Consumers are now connecting their health to the food and beverages that they consume. PepsiCo, who owns Gatorade, is facing a backlash regarding the types of unhealthy additives used in making their signature drinks.

So what’s inside a 32-oz Gatorade? It contains 54.4 grams of sugar which are more than the recommended daily allowance of an average person. Although 50 grams of sugar provides energy for individuals who are always working out or on the go, an average person does not have a need for it.

gatorade-label-serving-size-sugarSugar is the Silent Killer in Sports Drinks

There are different types of sugar. In chemistry, sugar is categorized as sucrose, fructose, glucose, maltose, and lactose. They are carbohydrates that fuel the body by providing the energy that it needs to sustain daily activities. Many food experts believe that sugar is one of the unhealthy additives that we include in our diet. It is important to take note that there are different forms of sugars, but one of the dangerous types of sugar for our health is sucrose, also known as white sugar or table sugar. Sugar is made from plants, and they can come from sugar beets or sugar cane. The natural juices are extracted from both plants and are crystallized to form white sugar which is made up of 99% sucrose.

Sugar is not a low-calorie additive. In fact, it has a high glycemic index (GI) which is a measure of blood glucose response after eating a particular food. Since its GI is high, this means that your blood sugar level is immediately elevated just a few minutes after consuming a tablespoon of it.

 

The Fight Against Sugar & Unhealthy Additives 

The ability of table sugar to raise the blood sugar level within a few minutes of ingesting it is the reason why people want to avoid Gatorade and other beverages.  For this reason, beverage companies are now launching innovations to keep their customers not only happy but also healthy. Many beverage companies are now offering low-calorie drinks, but their marketing strategy does not end there. Many companies are now attempting to create natural drinks by cutting out synthetic ingredients from their beverage mixtures.

For instance, PepsiCo removed the brominated vegetable oil from Gatorade’s formula in addressing the call of a 15-year old activist who launched an online campaign against the unhealthy additive. Moreover, the company also developed a sports drink that does not have artificial coloring and is sweetened with natural cane sugar.

The new line of beverages looks promising, but consumers are seeking drinks that fit their nutritional needs. Sport drink companies are trying to capitalize on the opportunity by creating healthier drinks without sacrificing the taste. For instance, both PepsiCo and Coke are now investing in coconut water, Suja juice, and sparkling water after calls by nutritionists to switch from sports drinks to drinks with less sugar and unhealthy additives.

Today, beverage companies are not only looking into making low-calorie drinks, but they also want to deliver beverages that are healthy—to fit the lifestyles of its many health-conscious consumers.

Inspired by businessinsider.com

beverages from whole fruit and vegetables nutrients vitaminsWhere are the Nutrients?

How are we able to market a beverage as “sports nutrition” and there are ZERO nutrients in the drink? On the other hand, some of these “nutritious” drinks are using synthetic vitamins and minerals to fortify their products. How is that any better? We should be looking for ways to deliver whole food nutrients into beverages like Gatorade and Powerade.

NutriFusion® developed a  patented method for stabilizing the nutrients in whole fruits and vegetables. We are here to help sports nutrition brands bring healthy, nutritious products to market. If you are interested in learning more, please visit the Beverages page below for more information.

World Food Prices Fell to Seven Year Low in January 2016

in

Since January 2016, world food prices dropped to a seven-year low, going down as much as 1.9% below that of December 2015’s food prices. The Food Price Index was at 150.4 points, 16% lower than the previous year.

The FAO Food Prices Index

world food pricesSo what is the Food Price Index and why is it important? It is a trade-weighted index that tracks the prices of basic commodity groups like cereals, dairy, oilseeds, sugar, and meat in the international market.  It measures the monthly changes in the international prices of the common food commodities consumed worldwide.

The value of the world food prices is affected largely by different factors including:

(1) conditions of the global economy
(2) strengthening or weakening of the US dollar
(3) supply conditions in agriculture
(4) the micro-conditions of different countries

All of the basic commodities are affected differently by these factors.

For instance, the price of dairy products in the international market fell by as much as 28.5% because the industry was hit by a surplus of supplies alongside falling demand. This trend was also noted for meat products which are 15.1% cheaper since January 2015 because of the high supply of pork meat. On the other hand, the positive situation of wheat production led FAO to increase its estimate of the world cereal output in 2015. However, this increased estimate was still 1.2% below the recorded harvest of the previous year.

Although there is a seven-year downward trend of the food prices in the international market, this does not mean that there is a huge surplus of the five basic commodities. The food price index is an average measurement and does not us  give the total picture of what is going on in the commodity production. For instance, the micro conditions such as El Niño have a direct effect on agriculture which leads to a low production of commodities like dairy and wheat.

In a specific example, the crop prospects in Southern Africa have been weakened by the El Niño phenomenon which resulted in the prediction by FAO that wheat output in the region can go down by as much as 25%.  Moreover, the dry weather in Ukraine and Brazil also impaired the planting season of the farmers.

Agriculture in the different regions of the world is unique from one country to  another. Some places are experiencing severe weather conditions that are unfavorable for planting while agriculture conditions in places like Russia compensate for the low production of other countries. This has created a buffer for the world food prices.

World Food Prices Shopping Consumer

What Does This Indicate

Just like the other price indices (stock and commodities), the international world food price index is entering the bear market and it can be a sign of the presence of mild inflation. While it might be a cause of alarm for producers as the high supply meets the low demand, consumers can use this opportunity to buy more of the five basic commodities to help improve agriculture, the flow of products, and the market as well.

Inspired by reuters.com

New Study: Splenda Linked to Cancer

in ,

Whether or not sugar can have a substitute has been an often-debated topic. Consumers to reduce chances of sugar related diseases turned towards alternative sweeteners. One such product that was popularized as an alternative is Splenda. Splenda contains sucralose, a sweetener deemed harmless up until now.

The Problem with Sucralose

The Ramazinni Institute in Italy published a new study that revealed the dangers of sucralose. The risks include cancer and leukemia. Findings of the study do not align with the claims made by Splenda and their testing methods. Earlier studies on sucralose intake resulted in the conclusion that it remains “biologically inert”. Splenda products were marketed with a heavy emphasis on rigorous testing.  Consumers perceived the product to be much healthier than sugar, which helped raise Splenda’s sales to $177 million.

Here are the findings put forward by Ramazinni Institute in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health:

The test subjects included 457 male mice and 396 female mice. The subjects were administered with sucralose of varying dosages added to their food from 12 days of growth till they died. Sucralose dosage resulted in a raised level of cancer in the male rodents since the amount of Splenda in their diets was higher as compared to those of the female rodents. Also, researchers found the occurrence of leukemia among the male mice who were given a dosage level of 2,000 to 16,000 ppm.

Splenda is Still a Sweetener 

These revelations demand a further explanation on whether Splenda, even in small quantities can pose health risks. Additionally, the two human trials that got published and approved by the FDA lasted only four days and only tested Splenda regarding tooth decay. However, Splenda’s spokespersons claim that the research and its results are unreliable. The company is focusing on the data produced over a period of two decades which includes 100 research studies and experiments stating that “Extensive research strongly supports that sucralose is safe for everyone and does not cause cancer.”

Sucralose is an artificial ingredient. The major concern is whether the body can completely metabolize the ingredient. The Center for Science in the Public Interest strongly advises against the consumption of other artificial sweeteners like aspartame, saccharin, and acesulfame potassium. Sucralose is a lot sweeter than aspartame and has found its way into several food and beverages.

Inspired by techtimes.com